Egg vs Fish Tikka
Per 100 g, Egg has 154 kcal and 12.6 g protein, while Fish Tikka has 117 kcal and 16 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Egg | Fish Tikka | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 154 kcal | 117 kcal better | 24% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 12.6 g | 16 g better | 21% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 1.2 g better | 3.9 g | 69% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 10.6 g | 4.1 g better | 61% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 0 g | 1.2 g better | 100% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 1.2 g | 1.2 g | about the same |
Which is better for weight loss?
Fish Tikka
Fish Tikka is the lighter choice at 117 kcal per 100 g against 154 for Egg — about 24% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Egg a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Fish Tikka
Fish Tikka is the stronger protein source, with 16 g per 100 g against 12.6 g for Egg. To match that from Egg you would have to eat roughly 1.3 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Egg vs Fish Tikka — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.