Ginger Chicken vs Gushtaba
Per 100 g, Ginger Chicken has 129 kcal and 8.3 g protein, while Gushtaba has 97 kcal and 6.3 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Ginger Chicken | Gushtaba | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 129 kcal | 97 kcal better | 25% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 8.3 g better | 6.3 g | 24% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 5.6 g | 3.1 g better | 45% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 8.3 g | 6.8 g better | 18% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 1.2 g better | 0.6 g | 50% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 1.9 g better | 2.1 g | 10% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Gushtaba
Gushtaba is the lighter choice at 97 kcal per 100 g against 129 for Ginger Chicken — about 25% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Ginger Chicken a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Ginger Chicken
Ginger Chicken is the stronger protein source, with 8.3 g per 100 g against 6.3 g for Gushtaba. To match that from Gushtaba you would have to eat roughly 1.3 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target. Worth noting the trade-off: Gushtaba is more efficient per calorie (6.5 g of protein per 100 kcal against 6.4 g), so it is the better pick if you are also holding calories down.
Ginger Chicken vs Gushtaba — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.