Gushtaba vs Mutton Yakhni
Per 100 g, Gushtaba has 97 kcal and 6.3 g protein, while Mutton Yakhni has 104 kcal and 8.3 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Gushtaba | Mutton Yakhni | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 97 kcal better | 104 kcal | 6% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 6.3 g | 8.3 g better | 24% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 3.1 g | 0.9 g better | 71% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 6.8 g better | 7.7 g | 12% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 0.6 g | 0.7 g better | 14% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 2.1 g | 0.1 g better | 95% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Gushtaba
Gushtaba is the lighter choice at 97 kcal per 100 g against 104 for Mutton Yakhni — about 6% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Mutton Yakhni a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Mutton Yakhni
Mutton Yakhni is the stronger protein source, with 8.3 g per 100 g against 6.3 g for Gushtaba. To match that from Gushtaba you would have to eat roughly 1.3 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Gushtaba vs Mutton Yakhni — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.