Lassi vs Naan

Per 100 g, Lassi has 64 kcal and 2 g protein, while Naan has 286 kcal and 8 g protein.

Lassi

64
kcal per 100 ml
2 g protein

Naan

286
kcal per 100 ml
8 g protein

Nutrition compared, per 100 ml

Both foods are shown per 100 ml so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.

Nutrient Lassi Naan Difference
Calories Fewer calories for the same weight 64 kcal better 286 kcal 78%
Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle 2 g 8 g better 75%
Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets 8.8 g better 51.8 g 83%
Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density 2.2 g better 5 g 56%
Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion 0 g 1.9 g better 100%
Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response 8 g 5.6 g better 30%
"Better" marks the more favourable value for a general healthy-eating goal, not a judgement about the food overall. Differences under 5% are treated as equivalent.

Which is better for weight loss?

Lassi

Lassi is the lighter choice at 64 kcal per 100 g against 286 for Naan — about 78% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Naan a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.

Which is better for muscle gain?

Naan

Naan is the stronger protein source, with 8 g per 100 g against 2 g for Lassi. To match that from Lassi you would have to eat roughly 4 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target. Worth noting the trade-off: Lassi is more efficient per calorie (3.1 g of protein per 100 kcal against 2.8 g), so it is the better pick if you are also holding calories down.

Lassi vs Naan — common questions

Naan has more calories — about 286 kcal per 100 g compared with 64 kcal for Lassi.

Naan has more protein — 8 g per 100 g against 2 g for Lassi.

Lassi is the lighter choice at 64 kcal per 100 g against 286 for Naan — about 78% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Naan a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.

Naan is the stronger protein source, with 8 g per 100 g against 2 g for Lassi. To match that from Lassi you would have to eat roughly 4 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target. Worth noting the trade-off: Lassi is more efficient per calorie (3.1 g of protein per 100 kcal against 2.8 g), so it is the better pick if you are also holding calories down.

Yes. Combining them gives roughly 350 kcal and 10 g protein per 100 g of each. Indian meals are usually built from pairs like this, and mixing a grain with a protein source generally makes for a better-balanced plate than either on its own.

For most everyday goals Lassi has the edge, mainly on calorie density. Per 100 g, Lassi has 64 kcal and 2 g protein, while Naan has 286 kcal and 8 g protein. Healthy eating depends far more on total daily intake and portion size than on picking one of these two.
Full Lassi nutrition & serving sizes
Full Naan nutrition & serving sizes

Other comparisons

Lassi vs Chai Lassi vs Palak Paneer Lassi vs Paratha Lassi vs Roti Lassi vs Chicken Curry Lassi vs Methi Thepla

Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.

General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.