Lassi vs Pav Bhaji
Per 100 g, Lassi has 64 kcal and 2 g protein, while Pav Bhaji has 133 kcal and 2.7 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 ml
Both foods are shown per 100 ml so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Lassi | Pav Bhaji | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 64 kcal better | 133 kcal | 52% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 2 g | 2.7 g better | 26% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 8.8 g better | 15 g | 41% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 2.2 g better | 6.7 g | 67% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 0 g | 1.3 g better | 100% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 8 g | 2 g better | 75% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Lassi
Lassi is the lighter choice at 64 kcal per 100 g against 133 for Pav Bhaji — about 52% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Pav Bhaji a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Pav Bhaji
Pav Bhaji is the stronger protein source, with 2.7 g per 100 g against 2 g for Lassi. To match that from Lassi you would have to eat roughly 1.4 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target. Worth noting the trade-off: Lassi is more efficient per calorie (3.1 g of protein per 100 kcal against 2 g), so it is the better pick if you are also holding calories down.
Lassi vs Pav Bhaji — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.