Lassi vs Plain Pulao
Per 100 g, Lassi has 64 kcal and 2 g protein, while Plain Pulao has 140 kcal and 2.3 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 ml
Both foods are shown per 100 ml so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Lassi | Plain Pulao | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 64 kcal better | 140 kcal | 54% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 2 g | 2.3 g better | 13% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 8.8 g better | 21.8 g | 60% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 2.2 g better | 4.6 g | 52% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 0 g | 1.7 g better | 100% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 8 g | 1.1 g better | 86% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Lassi
Lassi is the lighter choice at 64 kcal per 100 g against 140 for Plain Pulao — about 54% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Plain Pulao a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Plain Pulao
Plain Pulao is the stronger protein source, with 2.3 g per 100 g against 2 g for Lassi. To match that from Lassi you would have to eat roughly 1.2 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target. Worth noting the trade-off: Lassi is more efficient per calorie (3.1 g of protein per 100 kcal against 1.6 g), so it is the better pick if you are also holding calories down.
Lassi vs Plain Pulao — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.