Lobia Curry vs Urad Dal
Per 100 g, Lobia Curry has 149 kcal and 6.1 g protein, while Urad Dal has 61 kcal and 2.5 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Lobia Curry | Urad Dal | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 149 kcal | 61 kcal better | 59% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 6.1 g better | 2.5 g | 59% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 17.9 g | 5.9 g better | 67% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 5.6 g | 3 g better | 46% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 4.6 g better | 1.5 g | 67% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 2.5 g | 0.3 g better | 88% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Urad Dal
Urad Dal is the lighter choice at 61 kcal per 100 g against 149 for Lobia Curry — about 59% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Lobia Curry a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Lobia Curry
Lobia Curry is the stronger protein source, with 6.1 g per 100 g against 2.5 g for Urad Dal. To match that from Urad Dal you would have to eat roughly 2.4 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Lobia Curry vs Urad Dal — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.