Lobia vs Raw Urad Dal
Per 100 g, Lobia has 320 kcal and 20.4 g protein, while Raw Urad Dal has 324 kcal and 23.1 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Lobia | Raw Urad Dal | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 320 kcal | 324 kcal | about the same |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 20.4 g | 23.1 g better | 12% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 54.6 g | 51 g better | 7% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 1.1 g better | 1.7 g | 35% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 11.5 g | 11.9 g | about the same |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 1.6 g | 0.8 g better | 50% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Too close to call
Lobia and Raw Urad Dal land within a few percent of each other on calories (320 vs 324 kcal per 100 g), so neither has a real edge. Pick on fibre and protein instead: Raw Urad Dal carries more fibre.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Raw Urad Dal
Raw Urad Dal is the stronger protein source, with 23.1 g per 100 g against 20.4 g for Lobia. To match that from Lobia you would have to eat roughly 1.1 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Lobia vs Raw Urad Dal — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.