Paneer Lababdar vs Roti
Per 100 g, Paneer Lababdar has 105 kcal and 4 g protein, while Roti has 180 kcal and 6.8 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Paneer Lababdar | Roti | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 105 kcal better | 180 kcal | 42% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 4 g | 6.8 g better | 41% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 3.4 g better | 37.5 g | 91% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 8.5 g | 1 g better | 88% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 1.1 g | 5 g better | 78% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 1.9 g | 0.8 g better | 58% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Paneer Lababdar
Paneer Lababdar is the lighter choice at 105 kcal per 100 g against 180 for Roti — about 42% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Roti a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Roti
Roti is the stronger protein source, with 6.8 g per 100 g against 4 g for Paneer Lababdar. To match that from Paneer Lababdar you would have to eat roughly 1.7 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Paneer Lababdar vs Roti — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.