Phirni vs Rasmalai
Per 100 g, Phirni has 116 kcal and 3.5 g protein, while Rasmalai has 135 kcal and 1.7 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Phirni | Rasmalai | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 116 kcal better | 135 kcal | 14% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 3.5 g better | 1.7 g | 51% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 16.1 g better | 29.2 g | 45% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 4.3 g | 2.2 g better | 49% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 0.4 g better | 0 g | 100% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 10.8 g better | 28.7 g | 62% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Phirni
Phirni is the lighter choice at 116 kcal per 100 g against 135 for Rasmalai — about 14% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Rasmalai a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Phirni
Phirni is the stronger protein source, with 3.5 g per 100 g against 1.7 g for Rasmalai. To match that from Rasmalai you would have to eat roughly 2.1 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Phirni vs Rasmalai — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.