Poha vs Raw Poha
Per 100 g, Poha has 120 kcal and 2.3 g protein, while Raw Poha has 354 kcal and 7.4 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Poha | Raw Poha | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 120 kcal better | 354 kcal | 66% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 2.3 g | 7.4 g better | 69% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 21.3 g better | 76.8 g | 72% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 3 g | 1.1 g better | 63% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 1 g | 3.5 g better | 71% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 0.7 g | 0.3 g better | 57% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Poha
Poha is the lighter choice at 120 kcal per 100 g against 354 for Raw Poha — about 66% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Raw Poha a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Raw Poha
Raw Poha is the stronger protein source, with 7.4 g per 100 g against 2.3 g for Poha. To match that from Poha you would have to eat roughly 3.2 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Poha vs Raw Poha — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.