Bael Sharbat vs Lassi

Per 100 g, Bael Sharbat has 34 kcal and 0.6 g protein, while Lassi has 64 kcal and 2 g protein.

Bael Sharbat

34
kcal per 100 ml
0.6 g protein

Lassi

64
kcal per 100 ml
2 g protein

Nutrition compared, per 100 ml

Both foods are shown per 100 ml so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.

Nutrient Bael Sharbat Lassi Difference
Calories Fewer calories for the same weight 34 kcal better 64 kcal 47%
Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle 0.6 g 2 g better 70%
Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets 6.5 g better 8.8 g 26%
Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density 0.7 g better 2.2 g 68%
Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion 1 g better 0 g 100%
Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response 5.8 g better 8 g 28%
"Better" marks the more favourable value for a general healthy-eating goal, not a judgement about the food overall. Differences under 5% are treated as equivalent.

Which is better for weight loss?

Bael Sharbat

Bael Sharbat is the lighter choice at 34 kcal per 100 g against 64 for Lassi — about 47% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Lassi a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.

Which is better for muscle gain?

Lassi

Lassi is the stronger protein source, with 2 g per 100 g against 0.6 g for Bael Sharbat. To match that from Bael Sharbat you would have to eat roughly 3.3 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.

Bael Sharbat vs Lassi — common questions

Lassi has more calories — about 64 kcal per 100 g compared with 34 kcal for Bael Sharbat.

Lassi has more protein — 2 g per 100 g against 0.6 g for Bael Sharbat.

Bael Sharbat is the lighter choice at 34 kcal per 100 g against 64 for Lassi — about 47% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Lassi a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.

Lassi is the stronger protein source, with 2 g per 100 g against 0.6 g for Bael Sharbat. To match that from Bael Sharbat you would have to eat roughly 3.3 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.

Yes. Combining them gives roughly 98 kcal and 2.6 g protein per 100 g of each. Indian meals are usually built from pairs like this, and mixing a grain with a protein source generally makes for a better-balanced plate than either on its own.

For most everyday goals Bael Sharbat has the edge, mainly on calorie density. Per 100 g, Bael Sharbat has 34 kcal and 0.6 g protein, while Lassi has 64 kcal and 2 g protein. Healthy eating depends far more on total daily intake and portion size than on picking one of these two.
Full Bael Sharbat nutrition & serving sizes
Full Lassi nutrition & serving sizes

Other comparisons

Bael Sharbat vs Chai

Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.

General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.