Baked Fish vs Soya Seekh Kebab

Nutrition compared, per 100 g

Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.

Nutrient	Baked Fish	Soya Seekh Kebab	Difference
Calories Fewer calories for the same weight	114 kcal	115 kcal	about the same
Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle	8.7 g better	5.4 g	38%
Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets	4.1 g better	10 g	59%
Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density	7 g	5.9 g better	16%
Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion	0.1 g	2.2 g better	96%
Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response	3.2 g	0.5 g better	84%

"Better" marks the more favourable value for a general healthy-eating goal, not a judgement about the food overall. Differences under 5% are treated as equivalent.

Which is better for weight loss?

Too close to call

Baked Fish and Soya Seekh Kebab land within a few percent of each other on calories (114 vs 115 kcal per 100 g), so neither has a real edge. Pick on fibre and protein instead: Soya Seekh Kebab carries more fibre.

Which is better for muscle gain?

Baked Fish

Baked Fish is the stronger protein source, with 8.7 g per 100 g against 5.4 g for Soya Seekh Kebab. To match that from Soya Seekh Kebab you would have to eat roughly 1.6 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.