Banana vs Custard Apple
Per 100 g, Banana has 89 kcal and 1.1 g protein, while Custard Apple has 99 kcal and 1.6 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Banana | Custard Apple | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 89 kcal better | 99 kcal | 10% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 1.1 g | 1.6 g better | 31% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 22.9 g | 20.4 g better | 11% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 0.3 g better | 0.7 g | 57% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 2.6 g | 5.1 g better | 49% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 11.9 g better | 13.3 g | 11% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Banana
Banana is the lighter choice at 89 kcal per 100 g against 99 for Custard Apple — about 10% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Custard Apple a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Custard Apple
Custard Apple is the stronger protein source, with 1.6 g per 100 g against 1.1 g for Banana. To match that from Banana you would have to eat roughly 1.5 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Banana vs Custard Apple — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.