Boti Kebab vs Chana Masala
Per 100 g, Boti Kebab has 133 kcal and 9.2 g protein, while Chana Masala has 120 kcal and 6 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Boti Kebab | Chana Masala | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 133 kcal | 120 kcal better | 10% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 9.2 g better | 6 g | 35% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 3.1 g better | 18 g | 83% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 9.3 g | 3 g better | 68% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 0.8 g | 5 g better | 84% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 2.1 g | 2 g | about the same |
Which is better for weight loss?
Chana Masala
Chana Masala is the lighter choice at 120 kcal per 100 g against 133 for Boti Kebab — about 10% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Boti Kebab a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Boti Kebab
Boti Kebab is the stronger protein source, with 9.2 g per 100 g against 6 g for Chana Masala. To match that from Chana Masala you would have to eat roughly 1.5 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Boti Kebab vs Chana Masala — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.