Catla Fish vs Chana Masala
Per 100 g, Catla Fish has 94 kcal and 17.9 g protein, while Chana Masala has 120 kcal and 6 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Catla Fish | Chana Masala | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 94 kcal better | 120 kcal | 22% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 17.9 g better | 6 g | 67% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 0 g better | 18 g | 100% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 2.1 g better | 3 g | 30% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 0 g | 5 g better | 100% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 0 g better | 2 g | 100% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Catla Fish
Catla Fish is the lighter choice at 94 kcal per 100 g against 120 for Chana Masala — about 22% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Chana Masala a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Catla Fish
Catla Fish is the stronger protein source, with 17.9 g per 100 g against 6 g for Chana Masala. To match that from Chana Masala you would have to eat roughly 3 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Catla Fish vs Chana Masala — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.