Chana Masala vs Dal
Per 100 g, Chana Masala has 120 kcal and 6 g protein, while Dal has 80 kcal and 5.7 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Chana Masala | Dal | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 120 kcal | 80 kcal better | 33% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 6 g better | 5.7 g | 5% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 18 g | 12 g better | 33% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 3 g | 1.3 g better | 57% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 5 g better | 2.7 g | 46% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 2 g | 1.7 g better | 15% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Dal
Dal is the lighter choice at 80 kcal per 100 g against 120 for Chana Masala — about 33% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Chana Masala a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Chana Masala
Chana Masala is the stronger protein source, with 6 g per 100 g against 5.7 g for Dal. To match that from Dal you would have to eat roughly 1.1 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target. Worth noting the trade-off: Dal is more efficient per calorie (7.1 g of protein per 100 kcal against 5 g), so it is the better pick if you are also holding calories down.
Chana Masala vs Dal — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.