Chana Masala vs Rajma
Per 100 g, Chana Masala has 120 kcal and 6 g protein, while Rajma has 110 kcal and 6 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Chana Masala | Rajma | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 120 kcal | 110 kcal better | 8% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 6 g | 6 g | about the same |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 18 g | 16 g better | 11% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 3 g | 2.3 g better | 23% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 5 g better | 4.3 g | 14% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 2 g | 1.3 g better | 35% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Rajma
Rajma is the lighter choice at 110 kcal per 100 g against 120 for Chana Masala — about 8% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Chana Masala a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Rajma
Both carry a similar amount of protein (6 g and 6 g per 100 g), so Rajma takes it on the calorie cost — 5.5 g of protein per 100 kcal against 5 g. You get the same protein for less of your daily budget.
Chana Masala vs Rajma — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.