Chana Masala vs Pomfret
Per 100 g, Chana Masala has 120 kcal and 6 g protein, while Pomfret has 123 kcal and 19 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Chana Masala | Pomfret | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 120 kcal | 123 kcal | about the same |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 6 g | 19 g better | 68% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 18 g | 0 g better | 100% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 3 g better | 5.1 g | 41% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 5 g better | 0 g | 100% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 2 g | 0 g better | 100% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Too close to call
Chana Masala and Pomfret land within a few percent of each other on calories (120 vs 123 kcal per 100 g), so neither has a real edge. Pick on fibre and protein instead: Chana Masala carries more fibre.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Pomfret
Pomfret is the stronger protein source, with 19 g per 100 g against 6 g for Chana Masala. To match that from Chana Masala you would have to eat roughly 3.2 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Chana Masala vs Pomfret — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.