Chicken Handi vs Shahi Paneer
Per 100 g, Chicken Handi has 166 kcal and 12.3 g protein, while Shahi Paneer has 157 kcal and 5.1 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Chicken Handi | Shahi Paneer | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 166 kcal | 157 kcal better | 6% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 12.3 g better | 5.1 g | 59% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 1.5 g better | 6.7 g | 78% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 12.5 g | 12.3 g | about the same |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 0.7 g | 1.4 g better | 50% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 0.7 g better | 5 g | 86% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Shahi Paneer
Shahi Paneer is the lighter choice at 157 kcal per 100 g against 166 for Chicken Handi — about 6% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Chicken Handi a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Chicken Handi
Chicken Handi is the stronger protein source, with 12.3 g per 100 g against 5.1 g for Shahi Paneer. To match that from Shahi Paneer you would have to eat roughly 2.4 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Chicken Handi vs Shahi Paneer — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.