Chocolate Eclair vs Shahi Tukda
Per 100 g, Chocolate Eclair has 240 kcal and 4.2 g protein, while Shahi Tukda has 190 kcal and 2.8 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Chocolate Eclair | Shahi Tukda | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 240 kcal | 190 kcal better | 21% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 4.2 g better | 2.8 g | 33% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 26.2 g better | 41.5 g | 37% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 13.4 g | 2.5 g better | 81% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 0.4 g | 0.5 g better | 20% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 17.4 g better | 34.8 g | 50% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Shahi Tukda
Shahi Tukda is the lighter choice at 190 kcal per 100 g against 240 for Chocolate Eclair — about 21% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Chocolate Eclair a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Chocolate Eclair
Chocolate Eclair is the stronger protein source, with 4.2 g per 100 g against 2.8 g for Shahi Tukda. To match that from Shahi Tukda you would have to eat roughly 1.5 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Chocolate Eclair vs Shahi Tukda — common questions
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.