Cucumber Raita vs Palak Raita
Per 100 g, Cucumber Raita has 59 kcal and 4.1 g protein, while Palak Raita has 53 kcal and 3.9 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Cucumber Raita | Palak Raita | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 59 kcal | 53 kcal better | 11% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 4.1 g | 3.9 g | about the same |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 6.3 g | 5.1 g better | 19% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 2.1 g | 1.9 g better | 10% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 0.9 g | 1.4 g better | 36% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 5.2 g | 4 g better | 23% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Palak Raita
Palak Raita is the lighter choice at 53 kcal per 100 g against 59 for Cucumber Raita — about 11% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Cucumber Raita a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Palak Raita
Both carry a similar amount of protein (4.1 g and 3.9 g per 100 g), so Palak Raita takes it on the calorie cost — 7.4 g of protein per 100 kcal against 6.9 g. You get the same protein for less of your daily budget.
Cucumber Raita vs Palak Raita — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.