Fish Curry vs Lassi
Per 100 g, Fish Curry has 111 kcal and 8.7 g protein, while Lassi has 64 kcal and 2 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Fish Curry | Lassi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 111 kcal | 64 kcal better | 42% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 8.7 g better | 2 g | 77% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 3.8 g better | 8.8 g | 57% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 6.7 g | 2.2 g better | 67% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 1.9 g better | 0 g | 100% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 2 g better | 8 g | 75% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Lassi
Lassi is the lighter choice at 64 kcal per 100 g against 111 for Fish Curry — about 42% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Fish Curry a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Fish Curry
Fish Curry is the stronger protein source, with 8.7 g per 100 g against 2 g for Lassi. To match that from Lassi you would have to eat roughly 4.4 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Fish Curry vs Lassi — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.