Fish Curry vs Rohu Fish
Per 100 g, Fish Curry has 111 kcal and 8.7 g protein, while Rohu Fish has 102 kcal and 19.7 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Fish Curry | Rohu Fish | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 111 kcal | 102 kcal better | 8% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 8.7 g | 19.7 g better | 56% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 3.8 g | 0 g better | 100% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 6.7 g | 2.4 g better | 64% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 1.9 g better | 0 g | 100% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 2 g | 0 g better | 100% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Rohu Fish
Rohu Fish is the lighter choice at 102 kcal per 100 g against 111 for Fish Curry — about 8% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Fish Curry a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Rohu Fish
Rohu Fish is the stronger protein source, with 19.7 g per 100 g against 8.7 g for Fish Curry. To match that from Fish Curry you would have to eat roughly 2.3 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Fish Curry vs Rohu Fish — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.