Fish Curry vs Tuna
Per 100 g, Fish Curry has 111 kcal and 8.7 g protein, while Tuna has 112 kcal and 24.5 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Fish Curry | Tuna | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 111 kcal | 112 kcal | about the same |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 8.7 g | 24.5 g better | 65% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 3.8 g | 0 g better | 100% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 6.7 g | 1.4 g better | 79% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 1.9 g better | 0 g | 100% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 2 g | 0 g better | 100% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Too close to call
Fish Curry and Tuna land within a few percent of each other on calories (111 vs 112 kcal per 100 g), so neither has a real edge. Pick on fibre and protein instead: Fish Curry carries more fibre.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Tuna
Tuna is the stronger protein source, with 24.5 g per 100 g against 8.7 g for Fish Curry. To match that from Fish Curry you would have to eat roughly 2.8 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Fish Curry vs Tuna — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.