Lassi vs Nannari Sharbat

Per 100 g, Lassi has 64 kcal and 2 g protein, while Nannari Sharbat has 89 kcal and 0 g protein.

Lassi

64
kcal per 100 ml
2 g protein

Nannari Sharbat

89
kcal per 100 ml
0 g protein

Nutrition compared, per 100 ml

Both foods are shown per 100 ml so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.

Nutrient Lassi Nannari Sharbat Difference
Calories Fewer calories for the same weight 64 kcal better 89 kcal 28%
Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle 2 g better 0 g 100%
Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets 8.8 g better 23.6 g 63%
Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density 2.2 g 0 g better 100%
Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion 0 g 0 g about the same
Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response 8 g better 23.6 g 66%
"Better" marks the more favourable value for a general healthy-eating goal, not a judgement about the food overall. Differences under 5% are treated as equivalent.

Which is better for weight loss?

Lassi

Lassi is the lighter choice at 64 kcal per 100 g against 89 for Nannari Sharbat — about 28% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Nannari Sharbat a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.

Which is better for muscle gain?

Lassi

Lassi is the stronger protein source, with 2 g per 100 g against 0 g for Nannari Sharbat. To match that from Nannari Sharbat you would have to eat roughly several times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.

Lassi vs Nannari Sharbat — common questions

Nannari Sharbat has more calories — about 89 kcal per 100 g compared with 64 kcal for Lassi.

Lassi has more protein — 2 g per 100 g against 0 g for Nannari Sharbat.

Lassi is the lighter choice at 64 kcal per 100 g against 89 for Nannari Sharbat — about 28% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Nannari Sharbat a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.

Lassi is the stronger protein source, with 2 g per 100 g against 0 g for Nannari Sharbat. To match that from Nannari Sharbat you would have to eat roughly several times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.

Yes. Combining them gives roughly 153 kcal and 2 g protein per 100 g of each. Indian meals are usually built from pairs like this, and mixing a grain with a protein source generally makes for a better-balanced plate than either on its own.

For most everyday goals Lassi has the edge, mainly on calorie density. Per 100 g, Lassi has 64 kcal and 2 g protein, while Nannari Sharbat has 89 kcal and 0 g protein. Healthy eating depends far more on total daily intake and portion size than on picking one of these two.
Full Lassi nutrition & serving sizes
Full Nannari Sharbat nutrition & serving sizes

Other comparisons

Lassi vs Chai

Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.

General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.