Milk vs Palak Raita
Per 100 g, Milk has 60 kcal and 3.2 g protein, while Palak Raita has 53 kcal and 3.9 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 ml
Both foods are shown per 100 ml so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Milk | Palak Raita | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 60 kcal | 53 kcal better | 12% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 3.2 g | 3.9 g better | 18% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 4.8 g better | 5.1 g | 6% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 3.2 g | 1.9 g better | 41% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 0 g | 1.4 g better | 100% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 4.8 g | 4 g better | 17% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Palak Raita
Palak Raita is the lighter choice at 53 kcal per 100 g against 60 for Milk — about 12% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Milk a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Palak Raita
Palak Raita is the stronger protein source, with 3.9 g per 100 g against 3.2 g for Milk. To match that from Milk you would have to eat roughly 1.2 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Milk vs Palak Raita — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.