Palak Paneer vs Paratha
Per 100 g, Palak Paneer has 110 kcal and 7 g protein, while Paratha has 300 kcal and 6.7 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Palak Paneer | Paratha | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 110 kcal better | 300 kcal | 63% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 7 g | 6.7 g | about the same |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 4 g better | 36.7 g | 89% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 7.5 g better | 14.2 g | 47% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 1.5 g | 2.5 g better | 40% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 1 g | 0.8 g better | 20% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Palak Paneer
Palak Paneer is the lighter choice at 110 kcal per 100 g against 300 for Paratha — about 63% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Paratha a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Palak Paneer
Both carry a similar amount of protein (7 g and 6.7 g per 100 g), so Palak Paneer takes it on the calorie cost — 6.4 g of protein per 100 kcal against 2.2 g. You get the same protein for less of your daily budget.
Palak Paneer vs Paratha — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.