Chana Masala vs Chicken Thigh
Per 100 g, Chana Masala has 120 kcal and 6 g protein, while Chicken Thigh has 200 kcal and 18.2 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Chana Masala | Chicken Thigh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 120 kcal better | 200 kcal | 40% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 6 g | 18.2 g better | 67% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 18 g | 0 g better | 100% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 3 g better | 14.2 g | 79% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 5 g better | 0 g | 100% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 2 g | 0 g better | 100% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Chana Masala
Chana Masala is the lighter choice at 120 kcal per 100 g against 200 for Chicken Thigh — about 40% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Chicken Thigh a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Chicken Thigh
Chicken Thigh is the stronger protein source, with 18.2 g per 100 g against 6 g for Chana Masala. To match that from Chana Masala you would have to eat roughly 3 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Chana Masala vs Chicken Thigh — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.