Chana Masala vs Poha
Per 100 g, Chana Masala has 120 kcal and 6 g protein, while Poha has 120 kcal and 2.3 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Chana Masala | Poha | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 120 kcal | 120 kcal | about the same |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 6 g better | 2.3 g | 62% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 18 g better | 21.3 g | 16% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 3 g | 3 g | about the same |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 5 g better | 1 g | 80% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 2 g | 0.7 g better | 65% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Too close to call
Chana Masala and Poha land within a few percent of each other on calories (120 vs 120 kcal per 100 g), so neither has a real edge. Pick on fibre and protein instead: Chana Masala carries more fibre.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Chana Masala
Chana Masala is the stronger protein source, with 6 g per 100 g against 2.3 g for Poha. To match that from Poha you would have to eat roughly 2.6 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Chana Masala vs Poha — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.