Chana Masala vs Upma

Per 100 g, Chana Masala has 120 kcal and 6 g protein, while Upma has 78 kcal and 2 g protein.

Chana Masala

120
kcal per 100 g
6 g protein

Upma

78
kcal per 100 g
2 g protein

Nutrition compared, per 100 g

Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.

Nutrient Chana Masala Upma Difference
Calories Fewer calories for the same weight 120 kcal 78 kcal better 35%
Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle 6 g better 2 g 67%
Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets 18 g 13 g better 28%
Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density 3 g 2 g better 33%
Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion 5 g better 1 g 80%
Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response 2 g 0.5 g better 75%
"Better" marks the more favourable value for a general healthy-eating goal, not a judgement about the food overall. Differences under 5% are treated as equivalent.

Which is better for weight loss?

Upma

Upma is the lighter choice at 78 kcal per 100 g against 120 for Chana Masala — about 35% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Chana Masala a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.

Which is better for muscle gain?

Chana Masala

Chana Masala is the stronger protein source, with 6 g per 100 g against 2 g for Upma. To match that from Upma you would have to eat roughly 3 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.

Chana Masala vs Upma — common questions

Chana Masala has more calories — about 120 kcal per 100 g compared with 78 kcal for Upma.

Chana Masala has more protein — 6 g per 100 g against 2 g for Upma.

Upma is the lighter choice at 78 kcal per 100 g against 120 for Chana Masala — about 35% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Chana Masala a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.

Chana Masala is the stronger protein source, with 6 g per 100 g against 2 g for Upma. To match that from Upma you would have to eat roughly 3 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.

Yes. Combining them gives roughly 198 kcal and 8 g protein per 100 g of each. Indian meals are usually built from pairs like this, and mixing a grain with a protein source generally makes for a better-balanced plate than either on its own.

For most everyday goals Upma has the edge, mainly on calorie density. Per 100 g, Chana Masala has 120 kcal and 6 g protein, while Upma has 78 kcal and 2 g protein. Healthy eating depends far more on total daily intake and portion size than on picking one of these two.
Full Chana Masala nutrition & serving sizes
Full Upma nutrition & serving sizes

Other comparisons

Chana Masala vs Tandoori Chicken Chana Masala vs Moong Dal Cheela Chana Masala vs Egg Chana Masala vs Poha Chana Masala vs Fish Curry

Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.

General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.