Chana Masala vs Soya Seekh Kebab

Per 100 g, Chana Masala has 120 kcal and 6 g protein, while Soya Seekh Kebab has 115 kcal and 5.4 g protein.

Chana Masala

120
kcal per 100 g
6 g protein

Soya Seekh Kebab

115
kcal per 100 g
5.4 g protein

Nutrition compared, per 100 g

Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.

Nutrient Chana Masala Soya Seekh Kebab Difference
Calories Fewer calories for the same weight 120 kcal 115 kcal about the same
Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle 6 g better 5.4 g 10%
Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets 18 g 10 g better 44%
Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density 3 g better 5.9 g 49%
Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion 5 g better 2.2 g 56%
Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response 2 g 0.5 g better 75%
"Better" marks the more favourable value for a general healthy-eating goal, not a judgement about the food overall. Differences under 5% are treated as equivalent.

Which is better for weight loss?

Too close to call

Chana Masala and Soya Seekh Kebab land within a few percent of each other on calories (120 vs 115 kcal per 100 g), so neither has a real edge. Pick on fibre and protein instead: Chana Masala carries more fibre.

Which is better for muscle gain?

Chana Masala

Chana Masala is the stronger protein source, with 6 g per 100 g against 5.4 g for Soya Seekh Kebab. To match that from Soya Seekh Kebab you would have to eat roughly 1.1 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.

Chana Masala vs Soya Seekh Kebab — common questions

Chana Masala has more calories — about 120 kcal per 100 g compared with 115 kcal for Soya Seekh Kebab.

Chana Masala has more protein — 6 g per 100 g against 5.4 g for Soya Seekh Kebab.

Chana Masala and Soya Seekh Kebab land within a few percent of each other on calories (120 vs 115 kcal per 100 g), so neither has a real edge. Pick on fibre and protein instead: Chana Masala carries more fibre.

Chana Masala is the stronger protein source, with 6 g per 100 g against 5.4 g for Soya Seekh Kebab. To match that from Soya Seekh Kebab you would have to eat roughly 1.1 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.

Yes. Combining them gives roughly 235 kcal and 11.4 g protein per 100 g of each. Indian meals are usually built from pairs like this, and mixing a grain with a protein source generally makes for a better-balanced plate than either on its own.

Neither is clearly healthier — the two are close on calories, and the better choice depends on what else you are eating that day. Per 100 g, Chana Masala has 120 kcal and 6 g protein, while Soya Seekh Kebab has 115 kcal and 5.4 g protein.
Full Chana Masala nutrition & serving sizes
Full Soya Seekh Kebab nutrition & serving sizes

Other comparisons

Chana Masala vs Tandoori Chicken Chana Masala vs Egg Chana Masala vs Fish Curry Chana Masala vs Boti Kebab Chana Masala vs Crab Chana Masala vs Baked Fish

Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.

General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.