Paratha vs Rajma
Per 100 g, Paratha has 300 kcal and 6.7 g protein, while Rajma has 110 kcal and 6 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Paratha | Rajma | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 300 kcal | 110 kcal better | 63% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 6.7 g better | 6 g | 10% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 36.7 g | 16 g better | 56% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 14.2 g | 2.3 g better | 84% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 2.5 g | 4.3 g better | 42% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 0.8 g better | 1.3 g | 39% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Rajma
Rajma is the lighter choice at 110 kcal per 100 g against 300 for Paratha — about 63% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Paratha a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Paratha
Paratha is the stronger protein source, with 6.7 g per 100 g against 6 g for Rajma. To match that from Rajma you would have to eat roughly 1.1 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target. Worth noting the trade-off: Rajma is more efficient per calorie (5.5 g of protein per 100 kcal against 2.2 g), so it is the better pick if you are also holding calories down.
Paratha vs Rajma — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.