Rajma vs Tandoori Chicken
Per 100 g, Rajma has 110 kcal and 6 g protein, while Tandoori Chicken has 130 kcal and 18.7 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Rajma | Tandoori Chicken | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 110 kcal better | 130 kcal | 15% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 6 g | 18.7 g better | 68% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 16 g | 2 g better | 88% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 2.3 g better | 5.3 g | 57% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 4.3 g better | 0.3 g | 93% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 1.3 g | 0.7 g better | 46% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Rajma
Rajma is the lighter choice at 110 kcal per 100 g against 130 for Tandoori Chicken — about 15% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Tandoori Chicken a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Tandoori Chicken
Tandoori Chicken is the stronger protein source, with 18.7 g per 100 g against 6 g for Rajma. To match that from Rajma you would have to eat roughly 3.1 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Rajma vs Tandoori Chicken — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.