Palak Paneer vs Rajma
Per 100 g, Palak Paneer has 110 kcal and 7 g protein, while Rajma has 110 kcal and 6 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Palak Paneer | Rajma | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 110 kcal | 110 kcal | about the same |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 7 g better | 6 g | 14% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 4 g better | 16 g | 75% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 7.5 g | 2.3 g better | 69% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 1.5 g | 4.3 g better | 65% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 1 g better | 1.3 g | 23% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Too close to call
Palak Paneer and Rajma land within a few percent of each other on calories (110 vs 110 kcal per 100 g), so neither has a real edge. Pick on fibre and protein instead: Rajma carries more fibre.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Palak Paneer
Palak Paneer is the stronger protein source, with 7 g per 100 g against 6 g for Rajma. To match that from Rajma you would have to eat roughly 1.2 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Palak Paneer vs Rajma — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.