Palak Paneer vs Upma
Per 100 g, Palak Paneer has 110 kcal and 7 g protein, while Upma has 78 kcal and 2 g protein.
Nutrition compared, per 100 g
Both foods are shown per 100 g so the numbers are directly comparable. A single serving of each is a different size, so serving-for-serving figures would not tell you much.
| Nutrient | Palak Paneer | Upma | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories Fewer calories for the same weight | 110 kcal | 78 kcal better | 30% |
| Protein More protein helps with fullness and muscle | 7 g better | 2 g | 71% |
| Carbs Lower carbs suits low-carb and diabetic diets | 4 g better | 13 g | 69% |
| Fat Lower fat means lower calorie density | 7.5 g | 2 g better | 73% |
| Fiber More fibre improves fullness and digestion | 1.5 g better | 1 g | 33% |
| Sugar Less sugar means a gentler blood-sugar response | 1 g | 0.5 g better | 50% |
Which is better for weight loss?
Upma
Upma is the lighter choice at 78 kcal per 100 g against 110 for Palak Paneer — about 30% fewer calories for the same weight on your plate. That does not make Palak Paneer a bad food; it means the portion has to be smaller to fit the same calorie budget.
Which is better for muscle gain?
Palak Paneer
Palak Paneer is the stronger protein source, with 7 g per 100 g against 2 g for Upma. To match that from Upma you would have to eat roughly 3.5 times the volume, which is usually the limiting factor when you are trying to hit a protein target.
Palak Paneer vs Upma — common questions
Other comparisons
Data source: nutrition values are drawn from the Indian Nutrient Databank (INDB), Vijayakumar et al., Curr Dev Nutr 2024;8(7):103790, used under CC BY 4.0, and derived from the ICMR-NIN Indian Food Composition Tables. Values vary with recipe, oil used and regional style.
General information only, not medical advice. See our disclaimer.